[gr8eman]

no...they just inserted Lautenberg, had a crooked judge call it legal (it wasn’t), and won the election!

[beaversmom]

I see. Who knows what they will try to pull? But I TRULY don’t think Hillary is going to leave unless she has a tag on her toe.

[Political Junkie Too]

That was a single state with a state office. SCOTUS punted on it because 1) they used the cover of it being confined to a single state, and 2) they were still stinging from the Bush v Gore debacle.

To repeat that, you will have to get all 50 states to agree to swap Clinton for someone else, and absentee and early voting has already begun.

The Torricelli-Lautenberg bait and switch won't happen at a national scale. All it would take is for one state to refuse, citing the same "equal protection" that liberals love. A single state cannot be forced by the federal government to alter their election that is already in progress just because other states might want to.

-PJ