Posted on 10/23/2016 6:56:24 PM PDT by MNDude
It is at www.market-ticker.org. - breaking from anonymous. Benghazi treason. Both Hillary and Obama.
38 some percent are voting for Illary no matter what comes out.
“When you vote for president you are voting for electors pledged to that candidate.”
That’s pretty clear on the TN ballot I voted. You’re not voting for the candidate.
Someone posted that he said he’d had an operative/mole in the White Hut for a long time — maybe a year. That could be interesting since he always has videos.
Way to go, Hildy!
Indeed, the revolution has begun!
“Unless he has her saying the N word , nobody gives a crap.”
It still wouldn’t matter. They’ll use the excuse, “What she says in private is her own personal business.” Robt. Byrd said it; nobody cared.
“They called him out as a criminal whose highly edited and highly misleading videos at Planned Parenthood of selling baby body parts was dismissed”
I don’t think that was Project Veritas. I believe it was another organization. (Maybe I’m wrong...)
“Maybe something like blacks are so violent, they are easy to manipulate.”
We have her on tape calling blacks “predators”. She’s still here. Nobody cares.
Cried wolf too many times
Only mildly interested in what he has at this point
So far all we got has been hamburger helper
With no meat
It would seem that his decisions have made him increasingly irrelevant and to recapture his past glory, he is rapidly moving to the left.
The left will never embrace him as he leaves behind what made him.
That is not correct.
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States. (US Const. Art. I, Sec. 1)
The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President ... (US Const. Amd. 12)
The electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, in every fourth year succeeding every election of a President and Vice President. (3 USC 1) (3 USC 2 allows the states to shift this day to later, by state law).
The electors of President and Vice President of each State shall meet and give their votes on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December next following their appointment at such place in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct. (3 USC 7)
State legislatures have prescribed a popular election for the purpose of appointing electors. The states appoint Electors according to a statewide popular election contest.
It is the Electors who cast ballots for candidates.
As it’s been said by me and many others on this forum, Hillary could bite the heads off of live puppies, boil them and eat them on live TV, and not lose a substantial portion of her voter base.
I have read it. There is NOTHING that binds the electors to a specific candidate.
thank you
You’re welcome!
You lie or are very ignorant.
Then enlighten me with the section of the Constitution or law that binds the electors to a specific candidate. I’m waiting.
“I heard that James Okeefe had a really damning video of Hillary and I was really disappointed that he did not release it before the debate. To make it worse Okeefe and Trump have allowed early voting to commence without allowing those voters to consider these “nuclear bomb “videos.
What fool would allow for millions of voters to go to the polls in a close election without showing this to them first? Especially when it is the Democrats strategy to have as many people vote is early as possible for their image of a landslide.”
Well, neither Wikileaks or O’Keefe are professional pollsters or politicians so they simply don’t have a clue on the momentum of campaigns or the optimum release time. In this case, with all the MSM behind Hillary I agree that it would have been better to let the most damning items out earlier.
What good will it be if the media won’t mention it or show it? Very few of those who need to see it most will be exposed to it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.