when a poll exceeds its own “margin of error” by as much as 10% which happened in 1996 - the “margin of error” was nothing but a figment of the pollsters imagination. Clinton was said to be leading by more than 20% on more than one occasion during the summer but won by 8%. All poll data is manipulated, and I’m saying for a bag full of unmarked $$$$ you can get any numbers you want. Who pays for the poll and what results make them happy? Follow the money.