Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: conservativepoet
Actually, they’ve identified the source as previous Clinton person. That’s very different from having weak sources.

Is the person actually identified?

Without independent verification of the source, and who it says he/she is, this is a nothing-burger.

111 posted on 10/18/2016 1:04:43 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking
Without independent verification of the source, and who it says he/she is, this is a nothing-burger.

Does that apply to the women who come forward to accuse Trump of sexual misconduct without any proof? The MSM presumes they are telling the truth and airs their charges without any verification.

The Enquirer is providing proof, i.e., In the bombshell exposé, The ENQUIRER will reveal the fixer’s dossier of smoking gun proof, including 24-years of documents, notes, and journals.

Does that meet your criteria? We all know the MSM will not cover this story unless they are forced to by the alternate media. None of them, including Fox, will mention it. They did the same thing with John Edwards until they had to relent.

153 posted on 10/18/2016 2:10:44 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson