To: OldNewYork
Why was this created? Malicious. Maybe it beats hitting the device with a hammer though.
Hillary's hammer will do the same with far less cost.
21 posted on
10/11/2016 4:37:41 AM PDT by
The_Media_never_lie
(Stay ignorant, my friends! (if you watch mainstream media, you will!))
To: The_Media_never_lie
True. More economical. The malicious part I guess is that it could be done to a computer someone had been entrusted access to and the owner might not realize for a while, and thus might not know who had done it. A hammer is more honest.
28 posted on
10/11/2016 1:41:53 PM PDT by
OldNewYork
(Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson