In any event, the Oklahoma courts have ruled that the authorities in this case have violated the law and Mrs. Bell's rights. What she did may upset the heathens but it was no crime. She has the right to exercise her First Amendment Freedom of Worship at a publicly owned place without being molested and arrested by police. She (and the Oklahoma judges) know the Constitution better by far than you.
Your "legal" argument is that you want people like her arrested. Not much of an argument. You are not the Emperor of Cream Cheese. Courts are often wrong but not here. As the judges are ruling, the Constitution prevails over your prejudices. The "authorities" had no right whatsoever to order her to leave, to stand, to stop praying and therefore arrested her wrongfully. No One died and left them God. They interfered with her rights. Mrs. Bell interfered with NO ONE's "rights."
Hopefully, she will relieve Oklahoma City of substantial dollars and devote every nickel to pro-life and other Godly causes and get a permanent injunction restraining further lawlessness by Oklahoma City officials under penalty of substantial (hopefully ruinous) fines for contempt and maybe even jail terms for law-defying public officials.
“She was arrested for kneeling and praying a rosary on PUBLIC property”
Incorrect. She was arrested for trespassing after she refused to leave when asked to by a police officer.