To: E. Pluribus Unum
We had an election in 1864. How do relatively small and isolated events like Charlotte justify declaring martial law? I’m not saying he wouldn’t try it, but it would be a pretty hard sell under the circumstances. I think he’d have a tiger by the tail.
52 posted on
09/23/2016 11:42:16 AM PDT by
Southside_Chicago_Republican
(If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.)
To: Southside_Chicago_Republican
There’s no provision for canceling elections under ‘martial law’ anyway. Blogger trolling.
56 posted on
09/23/2016 11:44:22 AM PDT by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson