Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nextrush

Slightly OT. I’ve seen some in the media try to tie Bundy, et. al. into the sovereign Citizen movement. Is there any truth to it or is it just a red herring?

CC


26 posted on 09/23/2016 5:44:52 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (CC: purveyor of cryptic, snarky posts since December, 2000..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Celtic Conservative

Sovereign’s dont carry a copy of the constitution around with them because they believe that it doesnt apply to them. The Bundy’s and LaVoy falling so hard on the side of justice in the eyes of the law is directly opposite of how soveriegns want the system to work for them. Most soveriegns believe that established govt higher than the county sheriff to be illegitimate. Soveriegns interpret everything as to how it can benefit themselves over others, The Bundy’s main mission was to show support for others who had been abused by the Federal government. There were no soveriegn citizens at the Oregon Standoff because there was nothing there for them to personally gain from it.

But it wouldnt surprise me if the media tried that spin.


30 posted on 09/23/2016 6:11:52 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Celtic Conservative

There’s all kinds of ‘discrediting’ going on in mainstream media and beyond with the pretend patriots of a web page called “The Oath” not to mention leftists who claim the protestors included “white supremacists” and the list goes on.


32 posted on 09/23/2016 6:31:01 AM PDT by Nextrush (Remember Pastor Niemoller: Freedom is everybody's business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson