Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Kozak
I agree it was a mistake, typical of Hollywood's almost complete lack of originality. But on the other hand, people ought to remember that the 1959 classic was itself a remake of the silent version, 1925.


56 posted on 09/08/2016 2:22:12 PM PDT by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: katana

Reception
The studio’s publicity department was relentless in promoting the film, advertising it with lines like: “The Picture Every Christian Ought to See!” and “The Supreme Motion Picture Masterpiece of All Time”. Although audiences flocked to Ben-Hur after its premiere in 1925 and the picture grossed $9 million worldwide, its huge expenses and the deal with Erlanger made it a net financial loss for MGM. It recorded an overall loss of $698,000.

In terms of publicity and prestige however, it was a great success. “The screen has yet to reveal anything more exquisitely moving than the scenes at Bethlehem, the blazing of the star in the heavens, the shepherds and the Wise Men watching. The gentle, radiant Madonna of Betty Bronson’s is a masterpiece,” wrote a reviewer for Photoplay. “No one,” they concluded, “no matter what his age or religion, should miss it. And take the children.” It helped establish the new MGM as a major studio.

The film was re-released in 1931 with an added musical score, by the original composers William Axt and David Mendoza, and sound effects. As the decades passed, the original two-color Technicolor segments were replaced by alternate black-and-white takes. Ben-Hur earned $1,352,000 during its re-release and made a profit of $779,000 meaning it had an overall profit of $81,000. It remains one of the few films at Rotten Tomatoes to maintain a 100% freshness rating.

Source: Wikipedia


57 posted on 09/08/2016 2:28:10 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: katana
I agree it was a mistake, typical of Hollywood's almost complete lack of originality.

Unoriginal, sure, it's a remake, but Roma Downey and Mark Burnett aren't really typical Hollywood.

In standard "them vs. us" politics, they may be as much or more "us" than "them."

58 posted on 09/08/2016 2:29:52 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson