Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz

Maybe I’ve never worked a system that let you pre-compile to the inner language of the database. Oracle is a biggie in the business world, though, and I’ve watched what happens internally when you do a full dynamic SQL versus a “precompiled” statement. Even with the latter, hunks of SQL get passed to the parser AT RUN TIME. Sure, the precompiler understood the SQL — well enough to munge it a little and send it on to the parser at run time.


77 posted on 08/26/2016 7:36:55 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

Nossir. I’ve seen my SQL get compiled and run faster.

But more importantly, Dynamic SQL does not work well in such frameworks and Entity Framework. There cannot be any Reflection. That means you cannot get Type Safety, nor can you leverage EF to generate code and classes for you.

Furthermore, D SQL doesn’t lend itself to the performance tools.

D SQL.

Just say no.


78 posted on 08/26/2016 7:40:57 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Every word the "News Media" prints these days are a lie, including "and" and "the".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson