And thanks for bothering to read it. I appreciate that.
I understand. My feeling was that the cases should be adjudicated in a scientific (not emotional) fashion by the governing agency, and not in the way I suspect they might choose nowadays, i.e. “He says he is a woman, that is good enough for us.”
I think it is wrong, and mean spirited to compare people like him to transvestites, who ARE mentally ill, and being encouraged to indulge it their illness by government and other supportive entities.