They may know from their real, internal polls that hilary has no chance.
I was going to mention that it also explains why all of a sudden there are countless FALSE Polls all over the News showing Hillary in the Lead. Pump her up, when she fails VOTE FRAUD, THE POLLS SHOWED.....
Pump her up, when she fails VOTE FRAUD, THE POLLS SHOWED.....”
Good point.
Pump her up, if they happen to win (if their vote fraud is successful), then Trump can’t complain (”the polls showed...”).
If she happens to lose (because...as relatively unbiased social media shows...Trump’s numbers are massive and their vote fraud is not good enough), then, they can complain (”the polls showed...”).
Isn’t this exactly the right game plan from their perspective?
Interestingly....there is always a market for “real” polls.
Is this LA Time/USC one of those?
You can’t stop people from seeking profit, and a bunch of stat geeks out in California think they have a good product. It “sounds” good. Large sample, sound methodology. There is no doubt that honest, legitimate polling does in fact ascertain opinions.
Is this one of them?
Interestingly, it is showing a tied race.
But after reading up about Trump’s social media numbers....I am now of the opinion that the true unbiased data which exists shows Trump has a commanding lead, and would likely win Romney states plus MI, WI, PA. Maybe a few others.
(We still have to accept that there are TONS of people out there...and many of them vote....that absolutely hate Trump...they hate him b/c they have bought into the worldview propagated by the media/DNC...they have bought into the baloney that “Trump is racist”).
So I’m not sure that Trump would win in a fair election in a LANDSLIDE. But I do think he would win. I think this is what unbiased social media shows.