Posted on 08/01/2016 8:27:01 PM PDT by LS
Great report!
Thanks for that informative post.
I think Trump will win if he backs off this Kahn guy and let him—not Donald—step in it. This applies for all other “bait” the democrats use to lure him with, at least until November.
Bump
I love me some Larry.
To take it a step further, how do you know anyone is even being polled at all? Because someone in the liberal cabal says so? We rejected so-callled “climate science” yet we accept any and every poll as if it were gospel.
For all we know they could simply be making stuff up.
What is your take on the USC/LA Times daybreak poll?
but the crooks cook the books so it looks like the witch will win, that way no one will point to vote rigging and fraud...
Pat Caddell, liberal, professional pollster, thinks Reuters is full of it...
“To take it a step further, how do you know anyone is even being polled at all? Because someone in the liberal cabal says so? We rejected so-callled “climate science” yet we accept any and every poll as if it were gospel.
For all we know they could simply be making stuff up.”
I completely agree! What do we know? We know the MSM will do anything in its power to elect cankles. We know the truth is not an important virtue to them. Look at every single headline and how it is written to help Hilary. Really, we have no idea if the polls are accurate or not.
Trump should just say “After seeing the credentials and history of this Kahn guy, I have nothing else to say about him...That all speaks for itself...”
Currently Trump is ahead in the poll by about 4 points.
They ask questions to assess the likelihood that the participant will vote and balance their results based on fixed demographic and voting pattern factors.
It's as fair a scheme as I have found at least at this point in time. By the nature of the methodology, changes to the polling results happen very slowly. You don't see the volatility that you see in phony polls like Reuters and NBC/WSJ. Voters change their minds but they don't do it overnight.
I have been a registered voter since 1971 and I have NEVER been polled...
There are also many adults who never have voted and did so in the primaries because they are inspired by Trump (who understands them—blue collars).
That is EXACTLY what I think!
This concern over the “youngest person” question is silly.
POLLSTERS DON’T GET ENOUGH YOUNG PEOPLE TO RESPOND SO THEY’RE TRYING HARDER.
The CNN/ORC poll omits the 18-34 age group in their internals because they didn’t get enough respondents to meet an 8.5% MOE:
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/08/01/2016.post-dem.convention.pdf
While it’s dangerous to single out any one poll, I too think these guys are coming the closest to getting it right.
I think it’s the best out there because it’s a daily, rolling poll of a LOT of people.
Gallup got of the polling business because its shady.
Today, polling is done to push an agenda rather than give us a true reading of where the electorate happens to be.
Hillary is probably leading. But by 11 points? Doubtful.
We won’t know the true state of the race until after the debates and when pollsters began sampling likely as opposed to registered voters.
In the meantime, expect the polls to be inaccurate because the MSM is using them to sell a narrative not to advance the truth.
I forgot to mention that today’s CNN poll has just 24% Republicans . . . and 48% Independents.
HUH?
Remember that the media gets its orders from the DNC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.