Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

The biggest downfall of the B-58 was that it was a one trick pony. It was designed around the weapons pod, making it highly inflexible and not able to deliver other loadouts. I could not see the B-58 being able to handle standoff weapons, either nuclear or conventional. No internal stowage due to being designed around a weapons pod, and no accommodation for external pylons. Its Soviet equivalent, the Tu-22 Blinder, did not have such a limitation.


13 posted on 07/29/2016 6:53:13 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Hayek

That was the plan back then. . .all jet bombers were designed to be primarily nuclear delivery platforms.

At the start of the Vietnam War, we really didn’t have our jets kitted out for conventional wars, from B-52’s to 105’s, they all had to be updated to perform conventional (non-nuclear) missions.


18 posted on 07/29/2016 6:59:03 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Hayek
The B-58 did have the capability to carry external ordnance. Four Mk43 nukes could be carried externally along with the big honker in the pod.

Sorry about the image size, but it would be a sin to reduce such magnificence.


60 posted on 07/29/2016 11:00:26 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson