To: Mariner
Sorry Keith but on Ed Sullivan they sounded better than you guys.
8 posted on
07/19/2016 7:09:26 PM PDT by
heights
To: heights
Sorry Keith but on Ed Sullivan they sounded better than you guys.
...
Well, he didn’t say the Stones were better live.
11 posted on
07/19/2016 7:14:24 PM PDT by
Moonman62
(Make America Great Again!)
To: heights
On their worst night the Fab Four were better than the Stones on their best night.
47 posted on
07/19/2016 8:03:05 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: heights
The Beatles sounded better live than the Stones but the Beatles sounded much better in studio production than live performance
The reason was that the Beatles were much more technical than the Stones and they really pioneered modern sound engineering and mixing at their Abbey Roads studio
The Beatles also had some really outstanding sound engineers such as Alan Parsons mixing and producing and The Beatles Abby Road studio was the gold standard of recording studios in its day
76 posted on
07/19/2016 10:02:23 PM PDT by
rdcbn
("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Milleraereh)
To: heights
But the Beatles were robotic.
100 posted on
07/20/2016 5:45:02 AM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson