To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton
Yes. Everybody’s quibbling about whether it was plagiarism or not and whether it matters, and whether or not we should help the media and the liberals by being critical toward the campaign. But the fact remains that somebody working for Trump in a very sensitive role was either incompetent or malicious. They need to be outed and removed, now.
2 posted on
07/19/2016 12:58:14 PM PDT by
Genoa
To: Genoa
Michelle’s 2008 speech was 96% Plagiarized.
That’s the story, stick with it.
9 posted on
07/19/2016 1:03:48 PM PDT by
TheNext
(Hillary Hurts Children & Women)
To: Genoa
My wife says, “They have a Mole!”
PS
Contrast
Wookie saying: For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country
With Melania: On July 28, 2006, I was very proud to become citizen of the United States.
No plagiarism there, sorry. NO similarity in their hearts.
10 posted on
07/19/2016 1:04:30 PM PDT by
Scrambler Bob
(As always, /s is implicitly assumed. Unless explicitly labled /not s. Saves keystrokes.)
To: Genoa; Elsie
But the fact remains that somebody working for Trump in a very sensitive role was either incompetent or malicious.
Another possibility is that Trump himself included the portions that duplicate Michael's/Michelle's speech on purpose...for a variety of reasons.
One outcome so far is that, nationally, folks are rallying to Melania's defense and are blaming "plants in the RNC" and every possible GOP and Dem scumbag that comes to mind.
Another is that 0's "wife" has been punked successfully because everyone now is reminded M0's words were delivered with complete and utter insincerity years ago.
Cue the Great Pumpkin, LC.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson