I think you misunderstand my position on this. I see no real benefit of having the area around the convention be ‘gun free’. (In quotes because only the law abiding citizens, not criminals will be affected by this). The real problem I see is that they will be disarming thr good guys and leaving them to the mercy of the criminal class. The elites won’t care because they will have heavily armed guards to protect them.
This two-tiered level of protection only benefits the criminal class. It has been shown that permit hilders in most states are actually More responsible and law abiding than even the police. No one has anything at all to fear from permit holders because the process weeds out the nasties fairly efficiently.
Personally, I think any venue that diarms its patrons should be held to a =much= higer standard as far as the protection of said disarmed patrons. Insurance rates should reflect this higher exposure on the part of the venues in question.
In a sane world being a gun grabber would have definite, and predictable consequences.
I agree that most licensed gun owners are more responsible but I also know black power groups are armed to the teeth.
I don’t have the answers just worry about the safety of our candidate and our country.