Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: keat

Meaningless without taking weight into account.


13 posted on 06/29/2016 2:52:57 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jjotto
Meaningless without taking weight into account.

Before I retired, there was a Mexican woman who flirted with me, but not too much as she knew I was happily married. She was very overweight all over, something that is not my cup of tea. Anyway, besides a humongous butt, she had very large breasts.

One day, she told me she was going to do something about her weight, and was taking time off for cosmetic surgery. She returned weeks later, and told me she had her breasts reduced. I exclaimed "No!", seeing her smaller ordinary breast size, as that was a highlight of her body, which was still huge elsewhere. Said she had problems with her back supporting her breasts. Without mentioning the other 200 overweight pounds. Sigh...

71 posted on 06/29/2016 3:34:23 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: jjotto

Meaningless without taking weight into account.””

Precisely my first thought. My second thought is how many are nothing but subcutaneous falsies? I can spot these from 6 inches, er, 6 feet away.


116 posted on 06/29/2016 4:34:56 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson