Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

the absurdity of letting faggots and feminists run our military.

there is not a woman on this planet... not a single one, i don’t care if she’s MMA trained or any of that other BS... who can win a 1-on-1 battle in hand to hand combat with an average military-trained man in his early 20’s, which is what you’d expect to find in combat. she doesn’t have the muscle mass, strength, leverage, or endurance to win.

all of the BS you see on “Vikings” about shield maidens and all of that other feminist propaganda coming out of Hollyweird showing waif-like 120lb super models karate chopping their way through a half dozen men without her even breaking a nail... is all FICTION!

too many women believe this to be true (don’t believe me? ask a millennial woman what percentage of men she thinks she could take in a fight. don’t be surprised at answers like 70% or 80%), but it’s not. these young women are delusional. they’ve been lied to their whole lives to boost their self-esteem. there are real differences between the sexes that cannot be dismissed away by the stroke of pen of a democRAT lawmaker.

if women want to serve, there are plenty of non-combat roles. it’s insanity to put them into 1-on-1 combat though. it’s insanity to change the military to pander these special snowflakes.


21 posted on 06/28/2016 9:33:00 AM PDT by TangibleDisgust ("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." - Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TangibleDisgust
What you said is reflected in this graph below:

That red hatched area is the overall disparity on the average male vs the average female.

Those turds think they are all pushbutton wars in the future.

33 posted on 06/28/2016 9:44:30 AM PDT by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: TangibleDisgust

“too many women believe this to be true (don’t believe me? ask a millennial woman what percentage of men she thinks she could take in a fight. don’t be surprised at answers like 70% or 80%)”


Well, you have to forgive them their error - most of the “men” that they associate with are like Pajama Boy or the girly-man who thinks that an AR-15 is a high-powered weapon. They probably CAN take 70% - 80% of them.


52 posted on 06/28/2016 10:45:22 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: TangibleDisgust

I recently had an online debate with some woman who argued guns should be banned because she knew karate and could whip any attacker. Someone that stupid deserves what she gets. Another woman suggested a Great Dane was a fine substitute for carrying a gun, because her Great Dane once woofed at a bad guy and the bad guy ran away.

The Stupid is Strong with Liberals!


53 posted on 06/28/2016 10:49:36 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of infants, ruled by their emotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: TangibleDisgust

ask a millennial woman what percentage of men she thinks she could take in a fight. don’t be surprised at answers like 70% or 80%),

You’re wrong. Of the millennial men she encounters, she probably COULD take 70 to 80%.

However, of the average “MAN”, closer to 10-15%.


58 posted on 06/28/2016 12:52:34 PM PDT by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. It's been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson