Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

There is also no science supporting a creator snapping life into existence with magic, OR an abiogenic start.
The fact is that neither point of view has an unassailable scientific explanation for the magic moment carbon based life began.

But if it began through an electrochemical process, the same conditions exist on millions of planets. You are being obtuse.

If one accepts that God created life on earth deliberately, and deliberately did not do so elsewhere. Then cool. But of course, at that point, trying to use science as your tool is.... awkward.


55 posted on 06/22/2016 2:07:04 PM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

“There is also no science supporting a creator snapping life into existence with magic, OR an abiogenic start.”

Indeed, which is why your argument is flawed from the get-go. You’ve made an assumption on faith and then you propose that you can make logical inferences based on that assumption. Yet, inferences based on unestablished assumptions are no more reliable than the assumptions they are based on.


69 posted on 06/22/2016 2:41:41 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson