Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham

I wasn’t advocating tanker conversions, but this exchange just reminded me of that book I read. Being a navy vet, I found it amusing that our ships were ducking for cover behind the tankers they were supposed to be protecting.


31 posted on 06/21/2016 6:41:31 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: OA5599
In truth, I have but a thin personal basis for my views. Intuitively, I rely on my father's stories and comments based on his experience as a graduate of Kings Point, years as a merchant marine officer, and time in the USN when his reserve commission was activated. And as a boy, I read my father's old marine engineering texts and his copy of Bodwitch's American Practical Navigator.

Notably, it has been proposed that if the necessary engineering and prototyping was done in advance, in an emergency, US flagged and allied merchant vessels could be quickly equipped with enhanced radar and surveillance capabilities and drop in batteries of antiaircraft and antiship missiles. Such vessels could have considerable value as naval auxiliaries even though they would not be suitable as front line naval combatants.

40 posted on 06/21/2016 9:49:14 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson