Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

>> it’s always best to structure your conspiracy theories so that you can claim anything at all that happens buttresses your case <<

Absolutely!

Moreover, when somebody denies being part of a specific conspiracy, you can be sure he’s actually in on the deal. Otherwise, why would he go to the trouble to make a denial?

Or if the culprit in question decides to remain silent, you can likewise be sure of his involvement. Otherwise, why wouldn’t he issue a denial?

Anyway, I’m old enough to remember when the John Birch Society persuaded us that Generals Eisenhower and Marshall were actually agents of the worldwide Communist conspiracy. The evidence? Simply that Eisenhower and Marshall didn’t exhibit the typical signs of Communist ideology — with that absence proving just how sneaky they really were. Oh, for those good ole days!


83 posted on 05/20/2016 11:09:21 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Hawthorn
Moreover, when somebody denies being part of a specific conspiracy, you can be sure he’s actually in on the deal. Otherwise, why would he go to the trouble to make a denial?

Yer involved. This comment is proof.

87 posted on 05/20/2016 11:28:52 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Chuck Norris finally met his match in Donald Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson