I worked with a guy back in the ‘70’s who came in one morning and was showing off and bragging about his new $250 Seiko watch...
I asked him what time it was and he said, “It’s 9:17...”
I said, “Funny...That’s exactly what my $10 Timex says...”
He shut up......
Hahaha! Yes, ultimately a timepiece tells the time, and a $10 Quartz tells the same time (in fact, more accurate time) than a $ 10,000 Rolex or Omega automatic timepiece.
But once you get into nicer timepieces, the differences between a $ 20 watch, $200 watch, $2,000 watch and a $ 5,000 watch are very noticeable. But ultimately, they should all reliably tell the time, and if that’s all you’re looking for in a timepiece, then you will be satisfied.
Personally, I find quartz movements annoying as hell and I can’t stand the sight of the second hand ticking one second at a time. Quartz movements (or LCD digital readouts) have very little personality. Automatic movements have heart.
First World Problem, I know. :-)
My normal-wear watch is a $13 Casio I got in ‘11; before that it was a $25 Casio I got in ‘03. I also got a $100 Fossil watch in ‘03 that I’ve worn about three times.