Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dhs12345
Too bad the gasoline engine is so inefficient, too.

Not all of them are. How about a 2L 4cyl putting out 300HP?

Too much? Use a smaller engine...How about a 500cc turbo, running at its optimal efficiency RPM, and running a big-@$$ alternator? When no juice is needed, it shuts itself off.

Add a couple (or four) deep discharge batteries, and the typical hybrid drive-motor set-up. The main differences being the smaller more powerful turbo engine, and the readily available car-parts store batteries.

I believe the big discovery in hybrid-car technology, is eliminating the transmission, and replacing it with an electric motor....NOT the rest of the hype.

83 posted on 05/16/2016 5:16:10 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Trump: A Bull in a RINO closet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: ROCKLOBSTER

The thermodynamic process of an internal combustion engine is notoriously inefficient ~ 20%. Diesel engines are slightly more efficient. And that doesn’t include the drive train.

I suspect that an electric motor is a lot more efficient.

Of course, when figuring efficiency a person has to include EVERYTHING!


84 posted on 05/16/2016 5:39:38 PM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson