It's as if they said in 1861 that the South was not allowed to leave; but in 1865, they said, until they passed certain laws, they would not be let back in. The positions are contradictory, though they are expedient political rationalizations. In both cases, they retain for the federal government leverage that they really shouldn't have.
No. That is not what that means. It means that those states were in rebellion and had to come out of the state of rebellion to be allowed the status of state rather than occupied territory