Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster
Yes, I understand that, but by using the term "re-admission", the federal government was conceding that the Confederate States had legally left the Union. But their entire premise for waging the war against the south was that they could not legally leave.

It's as if they said in 1861 that the South was not allowed to leave; but in 1865, they said, until they passed certain laws, they would not be let back in. The positions are contradictory, though they are expedient political rationalizations. In both cases, they retain for the federal government leverage that they really shouldn't have.

35 posted on 05/13/2016 1:45:15 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Repealthe17thAmendment

No. That is not what that means. It means that those states were in rebellion and had to come out of the state of rebellion to be allowed the status of state rather than occupied territory


86 posted on 05/13/2016 5:41:40 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson