[Vanity] Could Trump winning be planned?

[Robert DeLong]

Still an ass I see.

Yep, when talking to one, I am.

[Slambat]

“I suppose that Neil Bush bullied his way on to the Cruz campaign, or did he welcome them in with open arms?”

May I point out another fact that in your pursuit to be the
ultimate ass, you seem to have totally overlooked, though I
doubt you would have ever thought of it on your own anyway,
Ronald Reagan was a great conservative president even though
he had the ultimate RINO ridding in on his coat tails as VP.

Here’s something you can use to make yourself look as smart as
you think you are.

What did Reagan and Trump have in common?
They were both actors.

[Robert DeLong]

May I point out another fact that in your pursuit to be the ultimate ass, you seem to have totally overlooked, though I doubt you would have ever thought of it on your own anyway,

I see, can't argue without ad hominine attacks. A sure sign of desperation. Just like Cruz's bringing on Neil Bush was a sign of desperation designed to throw support to him from those that support the establishment. So he was not only signaling that he was establishment, he was hoping that those who supported Kasich would come over and support him.

How Bush became Reagan's Vice President

Here’s something you can use to make yourself look as smart as you think you are.

I find it amusing that people like yourself have taken it upon themselves to define Trump supporters as not conservative, immoral, and stupid low information voters. When in reality you all are just so butt hurt that you cannot rise above your own self importance, recognized by no one as such, but yourselves.

Now run off and support Hillary, either directly or via a third party candidate.

[Slambat]

“I find it amusing that people like yourself have taken it upon themselves to define Trump supporters as not conservative, immoral, and stupid low information voters.”

Yes we do because you are so willing to compromise on the
principals that you pretend to believe in and attack
the true conservatives that stand unswayed by political tripe.

Example: “Now run off and support Hillary, either directly or via a third party candidate.”

And you say that as a “supposed” conservative to a real
conservative standing his ground.

Now that’s just plain asinine. More of your flawed logic.

[Robert DeLong]

Perhaps I see a bigger picture than you, and no I am not compromising anything. The problem is you are so wrapped up in believing everything the press and your conservative talking heads tell you that you do not bother to find out the truth. The truth being that a lot of allegations leveled at Trump are blatant lies, pure and simple.

I said go off and support Hillary, either directly or via a third party candidate, because you sound like someone that could never support Trump, so by default you are supporting Hillary. As a conservative, I must question your conservatism. Because other than Reagan I have never had the person I supported become the candidate. But that didn't mean that I ran to some other third party candidate, or sat at home which would aid the Democrat. Never have I voted for the Democrat. Most importantly I never trashed the nominee. I may have vocalized that they were not my preferred candidate, but that was it.

No candidate, or President for that matter, was perfect, period. I had issues even with Reagan.

The problem with you "conservatives" is you will not look beyond your candidate to find out how and what Trump is about. In a lot of people's mind Trump is the right man for right now.

As a conservative, I do not expect other conservatives to use ad hominem attacks. I do, however, expect them from liberals. And no, my saying that I see you are still licking your wounds was not an attack, it was an observation based upon you referring to Trump as a conman.