Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 4Zoltan
The red arrow in the top-middle picture of post #425 does not point to "two antennas," as you wildly conjecture.

If you have no aviation awareness, please don't bother trying to pass such things off to those who do. You're only hurting your own credibility.

All you're really doing is showing us all the great lengths to which you'll go in saying anything in defense of this scenario, as if it were credible. But, that's actually be clear from your earlier posts, too, for those who could see it.

This was a hoax, one that cost the taxpayers scores of millions of dollars. A lot of interested people want to see that set aright. I'm just the messenger. If it weren't me doing it, there's plenty of other aviation folk and lawyer-types that have this information, too, to be able to share and work it if I'm not here. Get used to it--all of it.

The salvor would later try to explain to the media that the plane was taken apart in a winter swell. Well, no, divers were already busy working on the engine even as the plane occupants were around it, as seen by the copious bubbles above the flight deck and engine in the following picture:

431 posted on 08/25/2016 1:38:05 PM PDT by rx (Truth Will Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]


To: rx; WildHighlander57; butterdezillion; Fred Nerks
Oh, I see these two little antennas on the fuselage don't exist. And so naturally waves breaking over them will not be disrupted causing splashes.


438 posted on 08/25/2016 2:14:52 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson