Given that minimal context, I apologize, but it seemed to me you were talking about the entirely of the aftermath.
Nonetheless, your comments more largely seem entirely to be based on the videographer's jostling, not the actual plane's (inferred) buffeting.
As you know, I've watched the video many times, frame-by-frame at full, half, double, etc. speeds. I don't see passengers in that sequence spending significant time (as in none) firmly grasping unmovable objects to keep themselves steady. I see many hands moving about freely.
As elsewhere, the videographer does a nicely-planned job throughout of jostling his cameras to make it appear everything was tumbling when it wasn't.
The uniformity of the lie of how horrible the waves were contrasts entirely with the unimpeachable witness of video frames.
The clear commonality of your repeating what the passengers and others falsely said about the entirely of the aftermath implicitly leaves such comments as properly suspect if not to be rejected out of hand.
rx wrote
“...The clear commonality of your repeating what the passengers and others falsely said about the entirely of the aftermath implicitly leaves such comments as properly suspect if not to be rejected out of hand.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3428362/posts?page=404#404
You’re saying I’m repeating someone else’s falsehoods.
List which ones I’ve said; what specifically are they?