One thing is certain. Namely, that there are enough misstatements, contradictions, anomalies and outright falsehoods connected with this incident to choke a T-Rex. I can’t list them all bc I’ve only followed the case casually since the first mo or so. It seems that every time I glance at a thread, three or four new, verifiable contradictions and falsehoods are listed. It’s been that way from day one.
Unfortunately, it’s unlikely anyone will ever get to the bottom of the issue. That is bc highly improbable theories keep overshadowing the facts. I am 99.9 percent convinced there was malfeasance involved, but as long as the focus remains on long-shot theories, it will never be uncovered. That is just a shame.
Here is my theory. Fuddy is dead. She was meant to die. She needed to be dead bc she was the weak link in Obama’s BC scam. Had she been questioned, she would not have outright lied. [I covered earlier that she was not in on the cut and paste concoction. She was simply given the finished product and told it was real.] In giving truthful testimony, she’d have let the cat out of the bag. [I.e.: she’d have unwittingly fingered the perps.] So she had to go.
Further elements of my theory. Neither the pilot nor any passenger was in on it. Whoever planned it(I.e.: tampered with the plane’s engine) didn’t care if they were all injured or even killed. As long as Fuddy died, mission accomplished.
The hardest part would have been insuring that even if the others lived, Fuddy wouldn’t. How was that accomplished? The simplest solution in such a case is often the truth.
For example, was Fuddy on blood pressure medication? If so, substituting placebos for the real thing even for two or three days ahead if the incident would have done the trick. If an obese, out of condition person misses their bp meds for even 48 hrs, their blood pressure spikes. No way Fuddy was going to survive the stress of a crash-water-landing if her bp was already stratospheric.
If she wasn’t on bp meds, something similar could have been arranged. It wouldn’t be hard for a person or persons with sufficient resources and motivation.
I wish someone more familiar with this incident could list ALL the misstatements, contradictions, lies and anomalies. It would be helpful to see them all in one format.
Anyway, list or no list, that’s my theory. It’s relatively simple, and certainly does explain why the lies and contradictions have multiplied from the beginning. Something is being hidden; it’s just not as elaborate and complicated a something as some have conjectured.
My schedule is such that, should anyone comment on the theory, I can’t guarantee a timely reply. We’ll just have to see how it goes.
Not to worry, Fuddy provably lives, as shown in #247! Upon FH's and the pilots confirmation of her extraction and successful replacement, FH begins his trek to shore as seen in the following graphic:
The videographer called them all to shore some 45 minutes after ditching (as heard in the ABC video). He obviously considered it feasible. FH proved it, even starting about that time. Why did only person do it? Why didn't FP make that call 45 minutes earlier? They were only 50 or so yards closer to shore there than they were that when at the original crash site.
That videographer sure is cruel to make seriously injured passengers wait an extra 45 minutes out on the water when the townspeople that had gathered at the airport should have been able to get them out quickly.