[WildHighlander57]

The claim is made that the patch of reddish orange in upper right corner in top pic is forehead and eyebrow of a mannikin, and is behind Mr Key:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3428362/posts?page=258#258

And in pic #8 here, the same claim is made; a mannikin behind Mr Key:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3428362/posts?page=298#298

In post #298 point #8 above, the claim is made that there is only one frame showing the “mannikin”.

But in my sequence in post #384, there are 4 frames before rx’s “mannikin face” pic, the 4th being the frame corresponding to rx’s pic #7 in post #298, Mr Key’s knee.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3428362/posts?page=384#384

The frames in my sequence show that what is claimed to be a mannikin face, is actually key’s ponytail.

Those frames were left out in rx’s posts, in order to make it look like there was a mannikin, but when the missing frames are put in, it tells a very different story ...

that there was no mannikin, just his ponytail in back of Mr Key in those stills,

[rx]

As we see throughout this scenario, repeating lies, even from multiple occupants and other's lips don't make it so!

At trial, if a witness lies under oath --just once-- it's absolutely in order never again to trust anything that witness says.

I didn't say the mannequin's hair could only been seen in one frame, in context, I said the two of them (JK and Dolliana) being poised there was unique to that one frame that where we could seen the mannequin over Jake's right shoulder.

See that Jake's pony tail comes down to just the tops of his shoulders   ... and note the colors and highlight's of Jakes hair in the sun! but here:
we see flowing, non-water-straightened, undeniably red hair that comes down to the middle of his back, showing that what's in that picture cannot have been Jake's hair, PERIOD!