Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel
"...That is some ricochet...."

I know, right? But a direct shot at 10 feet makes less sense, at least fitting the evidence. C

76 posted on 05/02/2016 3:41:22 PM PDT by Chasaway (Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Chasaway

There’s some else to consider. A light powder loaded cartridge that reduced velocity.


84 posted on 05/02/2016 3:49:47 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: Chasaway

Angle of the ricochet seems kind of acute, at least at the ranges your giving.
Penetrating wound from a straight shot should be a round puncture; if the bullet was a ricochet the wound should be keyholed or at least pretty distorted, pathologist should be able to tell you that.
You might try contacting some of the ballistics experts on military bases in your area, or even their Corpsmen or Medics. They aren’t experts and probably couldn’t testify, but they have seen an awful lot of these types of holes in both materials and flesh (unfortunately).
They could probably direct you to some real experts.


141 posted on 05/03/2016 1:05:48 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson