Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: The Antiyuppie

I understand that but specifically described a scenario where 1) the nags weren’t working any longer than the mothers, and 2) the mothers were using time that was part of their compensation; there was no basis for complaints.

As for the school part, I understand that (and concur); I watch it firsthand drive Americans out of NJ (because they are sick of paying among the highest school taxes in the nation for someone else’s children). That is probably a holdover from the old WASP mindset that children were a positive thing (if not a necessity) for a culture and it was in the best interests of the country to provide an education for them at the public’s expense. Maybe the rationale is that someday one of those children will be changing our diapers when we’re old...


100 posted on 04/29/2016 8:21:33 PM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: kearnyirish2

“Maybe the rationale is that someday one of those children will be changing our diapers when we’re old...”

More likely, grinding us up for fertilizer.


104 posted on 04/29/2016 8:26:47 PM PDT by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson