Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

I live 2 blocks from target and have relied on it for 98% of my groceries the past few years. Their decision will inconvenience me greatly, having to go elsewhere.

I had an additional idea that goes beyond a boycott, because I’m sure the lib marketing dept just says, “oh whatever, this boycott is just potential dollars/etc.” Trying to diminish it basically.

So instead, what if normal customers went into target, filled their carts as usual with $200 of groceries/merch, and then go thru the checkout line as normal. Cashier takes 5-8 min to ring it all up, at which point the customer says “Oh! Sorry, I actually identify as a Walmart shopper today.”

Manager is forced to void the sale, thus Target Corp would “see” the dollar effects more readily. Plus the time wasted in ringing up a non-sale. If 15 people did this at 1 target that would be $3,000 for one day. At 30 stores that’s close to 100k. All of a sudden we’re not just talking boycott hypothetical sales but tangible evidence that their policies won’t be tolerated.

I actually think this could be quite effective.


35 posted on 04/26/2016 2:23:42 PM PDT by mills044 (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: mills044

44 posted on 04/26/2016 3:27:32 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: mills044
No, that would be harassment.
54 posted on 04/26/2016 11:20:26 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson