Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New State of Water Molecule Discovered by federal researchers
UPI ^ | April 25, 2016 | Brooks Hays

Posted on 04/25/2016 8:48:38 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: nickcarraway

How does it mix with whiskey?


41 posted on 04/26/2016 4:27:23 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So inside our cell membranes, we have these water molecules that have six different positions at once? Is that what these people are saying.

These water molecules are busy, busy, busy!


42 posted on 04/26/2016 5:34:26 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: map
What is this new state?

Ice nine. We're doomed.

wow, two Kurt Vonnegut references in 24 hours...(8^D)

43 posted on 04/26/2016 5:36:31 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler

Very interesting. I was a ‘fresh out of college’ engineer in the ‘70s, and don’t recall hearing about poly water. The story reminds me a lot of the ‘global warming’ hype. Maybe that, too, will be a Wikipedia footnote in another half century.


44 posted on 04/26/2016 5:44:57 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: map

I have read that fire is a form of plasma.


45 posted on 04/26/2016 5:51:06 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew

That is funny!


46 posted on 04/26/2016 5:52:04 AM PDT by Slyfox (When someone tells it like it is, is it the truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It’s all water under the bridge.

Or over the bridge.

Or through the bridge.


47 posted on 04/26/2016 5:54:48 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

48 posted on 04/26/2016 5:55:39 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crispy

49 posted on 04/26/2016 6:00:26 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Interesting


50 posted on 04/26/2016 6:12:48 AM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: map

No, I wasn’t even born in 1963... maybe it was a past life :)

I wasn’t really quoting anyone, just that stuff in quotes summarizes the “standard” interpretation of the old double slit experiment. There have been refinements on that experiment in the last few years that call that interpretation into serious question though.


51 posted on 04/26/2016 6:12:52 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: map

Well, there are only a very few ways we know to produce light (photons). One of them is black body radiation, which is how incandescent light bulbs work. However, there is no filament or other similar body in the tube of a fluorescent bulb, so that method is ruled out. Another is combustion, but nothing in the fluorescent tube is burning, so that method is ruled out. Radioactive decay can also produce photons, but there is no significant amount of radioactive isotopes in a fluorescent bulb, so again, that is ruled out. Another method is stimulated emission, but that would require an already existing source of photons, which the fluorescent bulb lacks, so that must also be ruled out.

Which leaves (as far as I can think), only the method of plasma induced into the “glow discharge” state. All of the elements required for that ARE present in the fluorescent bulb, so it seems to me to be the only possible explanation for those bulbs which can’t be excluded.


52 posted on 04/26/2016 6:21:02 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I think it requires extremely low temperatures and not just a tight confinement of the water molecules, so this probably rarely occurs in nature.


53 posted on 04/26/2016 6:23:24 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

You’re making sense. I may be on the way to a conversion.


54 posted on 04/26/2016 7:02:30 AM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Thanks, your explanation makes sense.


55 posted on 04/26/2016 7:08:32 AM PDT by jpsb (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied. Otto von Bismark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: map

Really, considering the evidence, there is no reason to doubt that plasma exists. You might not agree that it qualifies as a “fourth state of matter”, but it certainly exists.


56 posted on 04/26/2016 7:26:30 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: map
Is a fourth state of matter the only possible explanation? I will look into it.

It is the scientifically accepted explanation.

Have you heard of a plasma torch? They also exist.

57 posted on 04/26/2016 7:34:19 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: map

Long John Nebel. I had never heard of him. From his wikipedia page he sounds very interesting.

George Noory really does not float my boat.


58 posted on 04/26/2016 7:45:43 AM PDT by Slyfox (When someone tells it like it is, is it the truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

He was late night radio in the early 60’s. I didn’t get to listen very often, but he was always there, especially with his UFO guests and assorted nuts.


59 posted on 04/26/2016 8:07:25 AM PDT by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

So.... if you curl up into a fetal ball inside your sleeping bag while out camping in winter, are you doing so because you are thinking, or just simply responding to the environmental conditions ?


60 posted on 04/27/2016 7:19:44 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson