To: nickcarraway
1) seizure of assets without due process needs to end.
2) K-9 “alerting” needs to be ruled insufficient evidence for probable cause.
12 posted on
04/25/2016 11:29:39 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Yo-Yo
1) seizure of assets without due process needs to end. Yes...
2) K-9 “alerting” needs to be ruled insufficient evidence for probable cause.
...and yes.
15 posted on
04/25/2016 11:34:56 AM PDT by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
To: Yo-Yo
17 posted on
04/25/2016 11:36:10 AM PDT by
piytar
(http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullete)
To: Yo-Yo
K-9 “alerting” needs to be ruled insufficient evidence for probable cause. "Probable" means "more likely than not".
Police depts need to keep statistics on K-9 "alerting", versus drugs actually found. A K-9 who's alarms do not work out more than 50% of the time shall no longer be "PROBABLE" cause.
18 posted on
04/25/2016 11:36:43 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: Yo-Yo
K-9 “alerting” needs to be ruled insufficient evidence for probable cause. 
That's why I say that everyone should keep an open bag of dog treats in their car. If nothing else, it's reasonable doubt that the dog "alerted" to the bacon!
-PJ
30 posted on
04/25/2016 11:57:16 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Yo-Yo
2) K-9 “alerting” needs to be ruled insufficient evidence for probable cause. Like to see a K-9 under cross examination.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson