Supposing someone knew delegates and one confided that they had evidence of bribe, why would they tell you—” Bruce Campbells Chin”? The correct thing to do would be to bring the evidence to the FEC, of course. And for kicks, they would inform the Trump campaign and allow them to address the issue?
Perhaps a friend’s-friend contacted Junior. Or there are many others..........
http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/24/politics/donald-trump-jr-ted-cruz-bribery/index.html
According to the Federal Election Commission delegate bribing is uncharted territory. As a rule, desperate presidential candidates swimming in uncharted waters may be willing to take some chances, especially if vague and untested laws create opportunities.
These may not be literal cash bribes (or they may). But if a super PAC is buying plane tickets, renting luxury hotel suites, stretch limos, dancing girls for parties, booze, tickets for concerts and entertainment, 5-star dinners, more booze, masseuse, wardrobes, salon expenses, etc. that is all legal and wouldn’t even have to be disclosed under current rules.
Chin, as an ethical FR member.
Are those ‘favors’ bribes?
To back up their otherwise completely unsupported claim that they witnessed it. See, I'm not asking or expecting anyone to believe anything. But you are.
The correct thing to do would be to bring the evidence to the FEC, of course.
Why is that "of course" the correct hing to do? I thought bribery of delegates was legal. In which case, why would the FEC care? So sorry, you're going to need a better excise than that to explain why you won't provide any details for your claim.
And if you're going to make that kind of accusation, but refuse to provide any specifics or evidence to support it, then why should anyone believe that you're telling the truth? Sound more like you just made it all up, and are now coming up with some lame excuse why you won't provide any details.
In other words, you're probably just a liar.