Replies

It will be real interesting to see how all the Trump supporters feel when his "real person" believes he has no counterbalance and he decides to go "double-down" and smash-mouth on folks like you, when the core Democrat liberal he has been until 9 months ago emerges from the Tranny-safe bathroom at Trump Tower and you've had enough of the schtick.

You know what? Trump has been a public person for decades. We know who he is; we have seen it for years. Trump will only get in trouble if he starts trying to be something he is not. I think he is too smart to even try such a thing.

The "image" thing is no big deal, IMO. It is like learning better interview skills in order to make yourself competitive for a new job you really want. Knowing how to present yourself properly--speaking in clear sentences, wearing modest and clean clothing, learning not to fidget--does not change who you are as a person. But it certainly makes you look better.

It is also a big jump to conclude that Trump wants flocks of barely-disguised trannies crowding women's restrooms, when he questioned why we are even discussing this. In my whole life, I have never seen a male over the age of about 5 in a women's restroom or locker room--this "issue" wasn't even on the radar until the left made its obsession with sexual deviancy front and center (a consequence of the Obama presidency). This is not a matter for the president to concern himself over, in any case--the president actually has a lot of high level tasks he must perform, like giving direction to the armed forces, negotiating with other state leaders, developing a budget to present to Congress, etc. Why on earth do we want the president weighing in on who goes to which restroom? Let issues like that stay where they are handled best--at the citizen level. We don't want men in our restrooms; if a man decides to enter anyway, we'll let him know he is not welcome (ditto, for a woman entering a men's restroom).

The quality of poster here at FR seems to have changed over the years, or maybe emboldened under the smash-mouth umbrella of the Trump persona they feel more comfortable about outing themselves, particularly in this election season.

The quality of poster is the same. My core values are the same now that I have posted thousands of times as they were the day I first signed up to FR and posted my first thread comment. FYI, the site owner, Mr. "FreeRepublic" Jim Robinson himself, supports Trump.

We know who he is; we have seen it for years. Trump will only get in trouble if he starts trying to be something he is not.

He's in trouble with a lot of people for what he is and what he's always been. We're not "liars" for calling him out on what he is and what he's always been.

To your credit, it seems that you have the honesty to admit Trump hasn't changed at all, and that he hasn't kidded you, even as all his other acolytes claim that he has somehow become Mr. Wonder Conservative practically over night.

Fact is what he is and has always been is going to come back to bite you and all his supporters in short order, and you'll remember what I am telling you today.

For now, the "image" thing Mr. GOPe Manafort promotes allows you to see what you want to see about him, and project whatever you want him to be on to him, because you have no evidence of core character other than his business expediencies over the years to inform you.

But with all you say you know who is, none of that seems to bother you. No, Cruz, the 97% consistent conservative bothers you.

Cruz bothers you because his consistency holds up a mirror to your own inconsistency. That is what makes you uncomfortable about Ted Cruz and makes a lot on this Board uncomfortable about themselves, and I understand that you all don't like that.

As far as the seemingly changing quality of posters, I've been around here long enough to have noticed that I never had to get into a discussion with a guy who finds surgically sculpted men pretending to be women to be attractive. Assuming you have daughters as I do, just rest assured that they won't have their right to female privacy protected in the bathroom spaces in Trump's Towers.

Funny thing is Target has already received >100,000 complaints for their stance on protecting that 1% of queers at the expense of the 99% normal and the boycott is coming. By contrast not enough Chinese super bankers that he brags all the time that he rents to in Trump Towers are complaining, so this allows him the freedom to cater to proclivities of the NYC Values perverts on his small scale.

"Mr. FreeRepublic" supports Trump. I know that. He's told me that personally on other threads. And I know he'll likely be as disappointed with Trump as you will be when he someday smash-mouths those very people who have elevated him.

If he wins the nomination he'll do it at a time when you will have nothing to say about it.

FReegards!

“It is also a big jump to conclude that Trump wants flocks of barely-disguised trannies crowding women’s restrooms, when he questioned why we are even discussing this. “

Coming to that conclusion would be a big jump. My gosh, I don’t believe Trump wants that! Never crossed my mind.

But during the interview, he shoots down a great solution of them having their own restrooms, saying it would cost businesses money. Businesses are going to lose money one way or the other with this anyway.

But then he explained that offering restrooms just for them would be discriminatory (disappointing PC nonsense).