Thanks for the info, though it seems the mainstream academics reject the work of Velikovsky to whom you refer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Velikovsky#Criticism
Yeah, it seems like that. :')
Dr V's work has held up, his critics (bashers, ignorant ad hominem attackers for the most part) have not held up so well. In "The Sequence of Dynasties" as well as in one of his books published in his lifetime (just shy of 40 years ago), and rooted in the "Theses" from 1945, he states that the 19th dynasty is over 700 years younger than the conventional pseudochronology claims; Ramses II's guts, from his canopic jars, were RC dated just a few years ago, and not surprisingly, were over 700 years younger than they're "supposed to be." The critics are just plain flat out dead stone cold wrong.
Egyptologist David Rohl also doesn’t equate Shishaq with Shoshenq I in his chronology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_%28Rohl%29#Shishaq