People who think anyone who is sitting Senator from Texas could say anything but get rid of ethanol don't know which way is up. How about Ted's principled stand on queers marrying one another?
Oil companies have money, NY queers have money, Ted's stand is obvious in both cases.
Was that supposed to explain how to reconcile the original intent of the Constitution with Trump’s promise to keep the EPA and the ethanol mandate? It looks more like a an attempt to deflect the question and just keep talking about Cruz to avoid answering it.