Good post! And good examples at the end of the article.
No, AGW is settled science just ask the government or Hollywood - the authority on everything.
Remember, "scientific consensus" is an oxymoron.
Like "settled science."
I find this very helpful in the battle for truth in the fields of “climate change” and “evolution”. Both are filled with bad science. This is another article which supports these findings: http://www.amsciepub.com/doi/full/10.2466/17.CP.4.24
Sheldon Cooper lives!!!
This is going to continue to be an issue since science is monetized on the basis of positive results, yet most of the time scientists actually are eliminating negative results.
I tried watching Tyson’s ‘Cosmos’ but found him a bit of a self important buffoon. Apparently he received his PhD in Astrophysics from Columbia. So, can we determine if Columbia is actually the prestigious University that it’s reputation suggests? I know Leftists will be outraged that this author makes fun of Nye and Tyson (if the Leftists are even exposed to this article), but the shoe certainly seems to fit both.
“Yes, the path is rocky, they say, but peer review, competition between researchers, and the comforting fact that there is an objective reality out there whose test every theory must withstand or fail...”
Fact? That’s an assumption, NOT a fact!
If anyone wants to insist otherwise, point me to the experiment that confirmed there is an objective reality.
Bookmark