To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; ...
I have been worried that N. Korean nuclear tests, conducted not far from this volcano, would rattle it to cause premature eruption.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Yes, and there have been earthquakes in that region, which also could indicate force building up for an eruption.
3 posted on
04/15/2016 6:00:07 PM PDT by
BlackVeil
('The past is never dead. It's not even past.' William Faulkner)
To: TigerLikesRooster
A nuclear test would not cause a volcano to erupt.
That is the thing of bad Japanese Godzilla movies.
4 posted on
04/15/2016 6:04:08 PM PDT by
Vermont Lt
(Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Lol. The scale of forced involved with a volcano such as this make a nuke look like a firecracker.
6 posted on
04/15/2016 6:10:04 PM PDT by
piytar
(http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullete)
To: TigerLikesRooster
To: TigerLikesRooster
I have been worried that N. Korean nuclear tests, conducted not far from this volcano, would rattle it to cause premature eruption. I have often wondered if that might not be a good thing. The difference between excising a cancer early and waiting and hoping it will go away.
Waiting for a volcano to erupt allows for the build up of gases to enormous pressures that eventually explodes a rips off the top of the volcano's cone.
If somehow man were to capable of venting off the gases the explosion might be avoided the magma might rise and cool in a more controlled fashion avoiding the damage of sudden uncontrolled venting that is the usual eruption
18 posted on
04/16/2016 1:55:02 AM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson