To: KC Burke
If, as you say, he was arguing a position as Solicitor General for the State of Texas, then he, personally, was not trying to “ban” didlos or anything else. That is the purview of legislators at various levels.
Relevance of Kasich is not clear yet.
33 posted on
04/14/2016 5:08:18 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
("The world is full of wonder, but you see it only if you look." ~NicknamedBob)
To: Tax-chick
Couldn't he have just acted like Holder or Lynch and taken only the cases he felt like taking? Isn't that the new conservative position?
35 posted on
04/14/2016 5:10:58 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
To: Tax-chick
The Kasich reference was a jest. The term dildo can be used as a disparagement.
61 posted on
04/14/2016 5:31:50 PM PDT by
KC Burke
(Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson