Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: NRx

I always thought running in to the iceberg played a big part in the sinking.

Seriously, wasn’t the steel very poor quality as well? Very low carbon IIRC..??..


10 posted on 04/14/2016 10:30:22 AM PDT by IamConservative (There is no greater threat to our freedoms than Bipartisanship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: IamConservative

Poor rivets also IIRC?


13 posted on 04/14/2016 10:36:13 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: IamConservative

I once heard that if they hadn’t thrown it into reverse, but merely slowed down and turned, that they may have done a better job at avoiding the iceberg. The throwing it in reverse made it jam for a few precious minutes instead of just slowing down first and then going in reverse. I have no idea of that’s true or not.


16 posted on 04/14/2016 10:45:26 AM PDT by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: IamConservative

High sulphur content which made the steel brittle at low temps. Also the rivets were of poor quality even for the time.

There were also some design issues with the watertight bulkheads which contributed.


42 posted on 04/14/2016 9:03:01 PM PDT by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson