Posted on 04/14/2016 10:15:40 AM PDT by NRx
When the Stockholm hit the Andrea Doria head-on, it was fine; granted, it had an icebreaker hull, but the Titanic should have been OK with just front compartments damaged/filled. As I understand it, the attempt to turn while reversing (actually only slowing because of the short amount of time) probably exposed much more of the side of the hull than if they had just carried on.
High sulphur content which made the steel brittle at low temps. Also the rivets were of poor quality even for the time.
There were also some design issues with the watertight bulkheads which contributed.
Debunked? How so?
It is a kooky conspiracy, one of many. Others blame the Federal Reserve, the Jews, the Illuminati, the Jesuits etc. A very quick look on Google produces no shortage of articles and videos debunking this idiocy. Here are just a few off the first page of hits...
http://www.williammurdoch.net/articles_34_Titanic_switch_theory_01.html
http://www.markchirnside.co.uk/pdfs/Conspiracy_Dissertation.pdf
https://illuminutti.com/category/titanic/
This statements proves you didn't even know what that video was about, you just like to make personal attacks. The video was about the Federal Reserve. You're a troll.
Yeah, you’re right. The government never lies about anything. /s
Of course it was the Jews. Iceberg, Goldberg, Greenberg.....what’s the difference?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.