Posted on 04/14/2016 10:15:40 AM PDT by NRx
In the 1958 Titanic film "A Night to Remember," Captain Smith is consulting with the shipbuilder Thomas Andrews. After the two realize that the Titanic will sink and that there are not enough lifeboats for even half those aboard, Smith quietly says "I don't think the Board of Trade regulations visualized this situation, do you?"
In the run-up to the 100th anniversary of this tragedy this weekend, there's been a lot of commentary about who and what were to blame. Left unsaid is that the Titanic's lifeboat capacity is probably the most iconic regulatory failure of the 20th century.
The ship had carried 2,224 people on its maiden voyage but could only squeeze 1,178 people into its lifeboats. There were a host of other failures, accidents, and mishaps which led to the enormous loss of life, but this was the most crucial one: From the moment the Titanic scraped the iceberg, the casualties were going to be unprecedented.
Yet the Titanic was fully compliant with all marine laws. The British Board of Trade required all vessels above 10,000 metric tonnes (11,023 U.S. tons) to carry 16 lifeboats. The White Star Line ensured that the Titanic exceeded the requirements by four boats. But the ship was 46,328 tonnes. The Board of Trade hadn't updated its regulations for nearly 20 years.
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
When the Stockholm hit the Andrea Doria head-on, it was fine; granted, it had an icebreaker hull, but the Titanic should have been OK with just front compartments damaged/filled. As I understand it, the attempt to turn while reversing (actually only slowing because of the short amount of time) probably exposed much more of the side of the hull than if they had just carried on.
High sulphur content which made the steel brittle at low temps. Also the rivets were of poor quality even for the time.
There were also some design issues with the watertight bulkheads which contributed.
Debunked? How so?
It is a kooky conspiracy, one of many. Others blame the Federal Reserve, the Jews, the Illuminati, the Jesuits etc. A very quick look on Google produces no shortage of articles and videos debunking this idiocy. Here are just a few off the first page of hits...
http://www.williammurdoch.net/articles_34_Titanic_switch_theory_01.html
http://www.markchirnside.co.uk/pdfs/Conspiracy_Dissertation.pdf
https://illuminutti.com/category/titanic/
This statements proves you didn't even know what that video was about, you just like to make personal attacks. The video was about the Federal Reserve. You're a troll.
Yeah, you’re right. The government never lies about anything. /s
Of course it was the Jews. Iceberg, Goldberg, Greenberg.....what’s the difference?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.