So you want the choice to a) screw around, kill the baby, and spike the carcass, or b) screw around, have the baby (with no input from the baby daddy), go to court, and saddle dad with child support payments for the next 18+ years.
And you want the men to sit down, shut up, and have no say whatsoever in your "choice".
Get back to me when you’re ready to talk about court-ordered and enforced child support, and all your “choices”.
So you want the choice to a) screw around, kill the baby, and spike the carcass, or b) screw around, have the baby (with no input from the baby daddy), go to court, and saddle dad with child support payments for the next 18+ years.
And you want the men to sit down, shut up, and have no say whatsoever in your “choice”.
Yeah, I wonder how far a guy fighting child support with would get with: “She made a choice to have sex. Not my problem.”
“Get back to me when you’re ready to talk about court-ordered and enforced child support, and all your “choices”. “
This is exactly why I tell men to keep their pants zipped up! If you don’t want that woman to be the mother of your child, DON’T have sex with her!! Not even a “one night stand” it only takes one time for her to get pregnant.
And you want the men to sit down, shut up, and have no say whatsoever in your "choice".
Courts have ruled where a man and a woman enter into a written contract wherein the woman agrees to not seek child support if their encounter results in a child, such contracts are not enforceable. Their reasoning is the woman has no right to make that choice for the baby. Yet, in the same breath will rule the woman has the right to abort the baby. Totally insane! How can it be called a "choice" if there's only one choice?