Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

One million (or fewer) primitive people exhausted the natural resources of South America?

I find that difficult to believe, so I don’t.


17 posted on 04/11/2016 8:58:35 AM PDT by truth_seeker (I think in some shopping centers etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: truth_seeker
Actually, not. A hunter-gatherer culture needs far more land area to survive than an agricultural culture. A more recent case in point was the Comanchee, who reigned supreme over what is now the western 2/3rds of Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, the eastern third of Colorado and New Mexico and vast swaths of northern Mexico from 1668-1868.

Their peak population was never more than about 40,000 for a territory so vast. Just for contrast, the epicenter of their civilization, the 125 square mile city of Lubbock, Texas, now supports a population of over four times that size.

A more recent example was the island of Guam which, during the 31 months of Japanese occupation, supported a population of more than three times the pre-war levels PLUS was a major exporter of rice to Japan.

22 posted on 04/11/2016 9:41:20 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
"One million (or fewer) primitive people exhausted the natural resources of South America?

I find that difficult to believe, so I don’t."

But but but, they were Superhunters!

26 posted on 04/11/2016 9:53:59 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson