Fine. Granted. Irrelevant to this article.
Irrelevant to the article, perhaps, but not irrelevant to your first post.
Post number 5 thought there was a black angle to this story. He was wrong. In your reply, you did NOT say, “There is no black angle here, therefore your post is irrelevant.”
What you DID say was, “I know white women who (your term) “mated with” (married) blacks with no particular negative repercussions. In my church in fact. You deride people for their skin color?”
It SEEMS!!!! as if you are saying there is no difference whatsoever between chances of violence in a white/white couple vs. a white/black couple. I apologize sincerely if that was NOT your point. WHAT WAS your point, please?