Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hoodat

It may seem unfair to his supporters, but facts are stubborn things, FRiend.
He was all for it, wrote an Op-Ed along with Paul Ryan in the WSJ urging support then came down with a bad case of political flop-sweat, made sure it would pass then slithered over to Breitbart and did his usual “Did a chik? Dad a chak? Dum a chum?” lawyer thing explaining to us rubes what he really thought.
The interweb makes it tough on him with those of us unimpressesld with his virtuosity.


106 posted on 04/07/2016 11:31:00 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's fonding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: tumblindice
He was all for it, wrote an Op-Ed along with Paul Ryan in the WSJ urging support then came down with a bad case of political flop-sweat, made sure it would pass then slithered over to Breitbart and did his usual “Did a chik? Dad a chak? Dum a chum?” lawyer thing explaining to us rubes what he really thought.

Again, your first it is not the same as your second it. There were two different bills - one originating in the Senate, the other originating in the House. The one originating in the Senate died. The one originating in the House did not. It made it's way to the Senate. Cruz opposed that bill. His editorial is self-explanatory. You should try actually reading it instead of falsely condemning him prior to investigation.

Again, the bill Cruz supported is NOT the TPA bill Obama signed. That bill Cruz voted against.

115 posted on 04/07/2016 11:36:06 PM PDT by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson