Absolutely irrelevant: Totally different demographic of 30 years ago. Even NRO Columnist Mona Charen has analyzed the data and concluded that Reagan won’t be able to win California today. Carter’s polls plummeted in the flames of the desert crash in the attempt to rescue hostages. Never cite this nonsensical stat. UnlikeReagan, 73% of women who make up 53% of today’s electorate say they have a negative view of Trump. 1/3 of Republican voters don’t plan to go the polls if Trump is the nominee. Against either Hillary or Bernie, Trump is charcoal toast.
Seven months out from the general election and before the conventions have even occurred, what's really charcoal toast are your propagandist push polls. Such polls are universally known to be worthless, and are merely an attempt to manipulate public opinion, not measure it.
In any event, even if they were the Gospel Truth (and they're not), Donald Trump could easily make up such a deficit on the likes of Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. You can deny that all you want, but making such projections 7 months out is absurd, and is veritable "boob bait for bubbas".
Ask yourself, if Hillary/Democrats/Media Water Carriers are so confident about beating Donald Trump, then wouldn't they de-emphasize such valuable information? I mean, wouldn't they logically prefer that Hillary face Donald Trump so that she has the easiest go of it?
Answer me that.
Or, is it instead the case that Hillary/Democrats/Media Water Carriers actually have the GOP voters' best interests at heart, and they're just heroically trying to help GOP voters, and save them from making a mistake in their nomination process?
Answer me that.
I've posed these questions several times to you "push poll propaganda parrots", and have never gotten a single answer.
I wonder why...
And yet, 38% of men and 38% of women voted for Trump in Wisconsin.